Belgian vs Shoshone Family Households
COMPARE
Belgian
Shoshone
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Belgians
Shoshone
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
7.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
9.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belgian vs Shoshone Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,849,592 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Belgians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 63.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,615,877 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 63.8%, a difference of 0.080%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Belgian | Shoshone |
Minimum | 49.1% | 43.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 88.1% |
Range | 50.9% | 44.3% |
Mean | 66.3% | 67.0% |
Median | 65.2% | 65.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.7% | 60.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.8% | 73.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Belgians and Shoshone by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Celtic (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Netherlands (63.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Thailand (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |