Chippewa vs Native/Alaskan Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Chippewa
Native/Alaskan
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Chippewa
Natives/Alaskans
42.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Native/Alaskan Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,993,605 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.640 and weighted average of 42.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,631,690 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.628 and weighted average of 43.5%, a difference of 3.1%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 4.0% | 13.8% |
Maximum | 76.5% | 55.8% |
Range | 72.5% | 42.1% |
Mean | 36.8% | 39.8% |
Median | 38.4% | 41.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.2% | 34.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.9% | 45.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Natives/Alaskans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Ghanaian (42.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Inupiat (42.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and Bermudan (42.4%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (43.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (43.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Yuman (43.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Guatemalan (43.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (43.2%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |