Chippewa vs Jordanian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Chippewa
Jordanian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Chippewa
Jordanians
42.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
48.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Jordanian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,993,605 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.640 and weighted average of 42.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,389,697 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 48.4%, a difference of 14.9%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 23.6% |
| Maximum | 76.5% | 83.7% |
| Range | 72.5% | 60.1% |
| Mean | 36.8% | 51.6% |
| Median | 38.4% | 50.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.2% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.9% | 58.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 11.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Eritrea (42.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Sudanese (42.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Honduran (42.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Paiute (42.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.0% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from China (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Northern European (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Bulgarians | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Basques | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Jordanians | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Romanians | 98.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 98.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 98.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | North America | 98.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Laotians | 98.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 98.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 98.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 48.3% |