Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Currently Married
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Northern Africa
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
39.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,174,675 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.392 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 0.30%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 27.5% | 12.5% |
Maximum | 68.4% | 67.9% |
Range | 40.9% | 55.4% |
Mean | 48.9% | 45.1% |
Median | 49.7% | 45.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.0% | 41.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.2% | 51.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Brazilian (46.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (46.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Chile (46.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Latvia | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 46.7% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.4% |
Colombians | 31.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.3% |
Fijians | 30.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.3% |
Choctaw | 29.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.3% |