Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Jordan Currently Married
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Jordan
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Jordan
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
47.4%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Jordan Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,237,852 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.275 and weighted average of 47.4%, a difference of 1.7%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 27.5% | 29.6% |
Maximum | 68.4% | 61.2% |
Range | 40.9% | 31.6% |
Mean | 48.9% | 49.1% |
Median | 49.7% | 49.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.0% | 46.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.2% | 52.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are New Zealander (47.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Okinawan (47.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Portuguese (47.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Sri Lankan (47.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Laotian (47.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Australians | 90.2 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 47.6% |
Syrians | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 47.5% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 88.6 /100 | #121 | Excellent 47.5% |
Osage | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 47.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 87.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 47.4% |
Laotians | 86.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 47.4% |
Okinawans | 85.3 /100 | #125 | Excellent 47.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 84.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 47.4% |
New Zealanders | 84.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 47.4% |
Portuguese | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 47.3% |
Sri Lankans | 83.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 82.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 47.3% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |
Afghans | 81.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 47.3% |