Samoan vs Polish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Samoan
Polish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Samoans
Poles
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Polish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,059,815 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Samoan | Polish |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 18.6% | 47.7% |
Range | 17.1% | 45.5% |
Mean | 7.0% | 9.1% |
Median | 6.3% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |