Immigrants from El Salvador vs Polish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Polish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Poles
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Polish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,732,482 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.485 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 7.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Polish |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 9.0% | 47.7% |
Range | 7.1% | 45.5% |
Mean | 5.1% | 9.1% |
Median | 5.4% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Salvadoran (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Somalia (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (5.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |