Immigrants from Syria vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Syria
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Syria
Chippewa
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Syria vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,106,838 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 18.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Syria | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 14.1% | 20.9% |
Range | 12.1% | 18.9% |
Mean | 6.3% | 9.1% |
Median | 6.0% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Syria by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Syria are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |