Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Pakistan
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Pakistan
Chippewa
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,855,056 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 29.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Pakistan | Chippewa |
Minimum | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 16.3% | 20.9% |
Range | 14.3% | 18.9% |
Mean | 5.8% | 9.1% |
Median | 5.4% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Pakistan by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Australia (5.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |