Immigrants from Oceania vs European Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
European
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Europeans
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
36.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs European Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,341,631 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | European |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.26% |
Maximum | 20.2% | 38.6% |
Range | 18.6% | 38.4% |
Mean | 8.5% | 9.2% |
Median | 7.1% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Europeans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and Moroccan (6.1%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (6.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |