Immigrants from Oceania vs Blackfeet Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Blackfeet
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Blackfeet
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Blackfeet Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,475,903 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.202 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 17.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Blackfeet |
Minimum | 1.6% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 20.2% | 23.4% |
Range | 18.6% | 20.7% |
Mean | 8.5% | 10.1% |
Median | 7.1% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Immigrants from Yemen (7.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Shoshone (7.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Delaware (7.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Central American Indian (7.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |