Immigrants from Lebanon vs Immigrants from Congo Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Immigrants from Congo
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Immigrants from Congo
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
71.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Immigrants from Congo Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,145,766 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,119,695 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.96%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Immigrants from Congo |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.95% |
Maximum | 8.7% | 5.3% |
Range | 7.3% | 4.3% |
Mean | 3.6% | 3.0% |
Median | 3.0% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.79% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 0.77% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 0.77% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Congo by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |