Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Native/Alaskan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Natives/Alaskans
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,030,824 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,663,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 50.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 0.83% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 9.9% | 13.7% |
Range | 9.1% | 11.7% |
Mean | 3.0% | 6.0% |
Median | 2.8% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.68% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Immigrants from Guatemala (2.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Spain (2.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Taiwanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Honduras (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 96.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Uruguayans | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Israelis | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 95.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |