Immigrants from China vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Native/Alaskan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Natives/Alaskans
2.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,804,939 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,663,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 60.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 0.45% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 5.7% | 13.7% |
Range | 5.2% | 11.7% |
Mean | 2.6% | 6.0% |
Median | 2.5% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.49% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.87% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.86% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Haitian (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Jamaica (2.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Western Africa (2.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Okinawan (2.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (2.6%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Salvadorans | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Haitians | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.6% |
West Indians | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Senegalese | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Nigerians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Venezuelans | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |