Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
11.3%
DISABILITY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,432,465 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,811,859 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.75%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 2.4% | 6.0% |
Maximum | 31.7% | 34.6% |
Range | 29.3% | 28.6% |
Mean | 12.4% | 14.0% |
Median | 11.3% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 14.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Immigrants from Uganda (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Nigeria (11.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Nicaraguan (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Eastern European (11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Bhutanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 98.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 96.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 96.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 96.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Nicaraguans | 96.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 96.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 95.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 94.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Guyanese | 94.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.3% |