Chilean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Disability Comparison
Chileans
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
11.1%
DISABILITY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,664,875 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,811,859 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 4.1% | 6.0% |
| Maximum | 24.3% | 34.6% |
| Range | 20.2% | 28.6% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 14.0% |
| Median | 10.9% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Switzerland (11.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Poland (11.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Russia (11.1%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Eastern European (11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Bhutanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Chileans | 99.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.0 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 98.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Palestinians | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 98.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 98.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |