Immigrants from Congo vs Palestinian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Palestinian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Palestinians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Palestinian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,119,695 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,454,064 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.71%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 0.070% |
| Maximum | 5.3% | 6.8% |
| Range | 4.3% | 6.7% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Median | 3.0% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.79% | 0.93% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.77% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.77% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Palestinians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |