Immigrants from Barbados vs Palestinian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Barbados
Palestinian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Barbados
Palestinians
2.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Barbados vs Palestinian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,766,175 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.200 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,454,064 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 23.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Barbados | Palestinian |
Minimum | 0.76% | 0.070% |
Maximum | 5.0% | 6.8% |
Range | 4.3% | 6.7% |
Mean | 2.3% | 3.0% |
Median | 2.4% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.93% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.82% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.81% | 1.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Barbados by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Barbados are Vietnamese (2.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Guyana (2.3%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.4%, a difference of 2.7%), British West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and Guyanese (2.3%, a difference of 3.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Grenada | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Guyanese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Vietnamese | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |