European vs Carpatho Rusyn Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
European
Carpatho Rusyn
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Europeans
Carpatho Rusyns
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
36.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
35.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Carpatho Rusyn Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,341,631 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,605 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.050%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | European | Carpatho Rusyn |
| Minimum | 0.26% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 19.6% |
| Range | 38.4% | 19.0% |
| Mean | 9.2% | 7.2% |
| Median | 6.9% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Europeans and Carpatho Rusyns by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), British (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are British (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |