Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Carpatho Rusyn
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Creek
Carpatho Rusyns
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
35.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Carpatho Rusyn Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,605 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 37.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Carpatho Rusyn |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 19.6% |
| Range | 28.5% | 19.0% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 7.2% |
| Median | 11.7% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are European (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), British (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |