Creek vs Liberian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Liberian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Creek
Liberians
18.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Liberian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,450,672 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,084,793 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Liberian |
| Minimum | 5.7% | 10.6% |
| Maximum | 28.9% | 34.1% |
| Range | 23.2% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 17.7% | 18.4% |
| Median | 18.2% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.3% | 20.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Liberians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Ghanaian (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Barbadian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Kenya (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Bangladeshi (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |