Creek vs Bangladeshi Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Bangladeshi
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Creek
Bangladeshis
18.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Bangladeshi Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,450,672 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,390,027 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.169 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 1.9%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 5.7% | 5.8% |
Maximum | 28.9% | 36.1% |
Range | 23.2% | 30.3% |
Mean | 17.7% | 17.9% |
Median | 18.2% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.3% | 19.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Bangladeshis by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Ghanaian (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Barbadian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Kenya (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (18.3%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Comanche (18.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.3% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |