Bangladeshi vs Pakistani Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Pakistani
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
Pakistanis
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
11.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Pakistani Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,366,446 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,217,185 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 0.78%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bangladeshi | Pakistani |
Minimum | 0.71% | 0.88% |
Maximum | 9.0% | 14.1% |
Range | 8.3% | 13.2% |
Mean | 3.3% | 4.4% |
Median | 3.2% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Pakistanis by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Australian (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |