Bangladeshi vs Australian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Australian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
Australians
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Australian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,366,446 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,103,986 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 0.010%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Australian |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 21.9% |
| Range | 8.3% | 21.4% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 4.6% |
| Median | 3.2% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Australians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.35%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.37%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |