Alsatian vs Immigrants from Guatemala Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alsatian
Immigrants from Guatemala
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Alsatians
Immigrants from Guatemala
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
31.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Immigrants from Guatemala Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,679,981 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,192,086 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alsatian | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Minimum | 0.97% | 0.59% |
Maximum | 29.2% | 13.5% |
Range | 28.2% | 13.0% |
Mean | 7.7% | 6.2% |
Median | 6.2% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Immigrants from Guatemala by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |