Alsatian vs Canadian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alsatian
Canadian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Alsatians
Canadians
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
10.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Canadian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,679,981 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,391,973 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.333 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.48%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alsatian | Canadian |
Minimum | 0.97% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 29.2% | 38.9% |
Range | 28.2% | 37.8% |
Mean | 7.7% | 11.4% |
Median | 6.2% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 14.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Canadians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |