Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,709,588 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.318% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 318.0 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $47,380, a difference of 12.4%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $49,374, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $36,408, a difference of 1.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,914 compared to $83,682, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($41,737 compared to $42,430, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 33.4%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), poverty (14.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family households (67.5% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 8.4%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.16, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 0.60%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.92%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 42.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.3%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.40%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 5.6%).