Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Costa Rica
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Costa Rica

Iroquois

Fair
Fair
3,937
SOCIAL INDEX
36.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
208th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Costa Rica Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,327,200 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.182% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 181.5 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Costa Rica Integration in Iroquois Communities

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $87,255, a difference of 14.8%), median household income ($85,054 compared to $74,279, a difference of 14.5%), and median family income ($101,354 compared to $90,543, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $36,408, a difference of 7.6%), and median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $49,374, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaIroquois
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,464
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,354
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Average
$85,054
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,928
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,237
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,186
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,643
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,876
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,141
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,848
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and single female poverty (20.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.96%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaIroquois
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Fair
9.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Good
20.9%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Average
29.2%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.74%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaIroquois
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.5%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.6%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.9%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 14.5%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Poor
46.0%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.4%
Tragic
38.2%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.3%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.8%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.4%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.9%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.5%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.5%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.0%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.9%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 33.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.2%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Excellent
5.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%