Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Immigrants from South Central Asia
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,083,647 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 15.6 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($78,249 compared to $125,956, a difference of 61.0%), median male earnings ($43,461 compared to $68,960, a difference of 58.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $70,103, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $57,818, a difference of 14.8%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 31.2%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $46,324, a difference of 39.2%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,910 | Exceptional $52,660 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $78,249 | Exceptional $125,956 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $68,461 | Exceptional $106,057 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $38,426 | Exceptional $57,114 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $43,461 | Exceptional $68,960 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,291 | Exceptional $46,324 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,374 | Exceptional $57,818 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,701 | Exceptional $116,626 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $80,662 | Exceptional $124,188 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,735 | Exceptional $70,103 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 29.3% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 135.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 85.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 75.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.1%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.8%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Poverty | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Families | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Males | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Females | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 17.6% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Single Fathers | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 30.1% | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 34.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.0% | Tragic 74.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.2% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 68.0%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 46.0%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%), family households (68.2% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 12.1%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Family Households | Exceptional 68.2% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.2% | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.26 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 43.7% | Exceptional 50.0% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.18%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 91.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 56.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Fair 19.3% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 6.1% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 123.4%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 90.8%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.90%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Good 2.0% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.2% | Good 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Good 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Good 98.0% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Good 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Good 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Good 97.6% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Good 97.5% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Good 97.2% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Excellent 96.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Excellent 96.1% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 95.4% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 94.5% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 92.6% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.2% | Exceptional 88.4% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 72.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.5% | Exceptional 55.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.7%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Fair 12.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Exceptional 20.6% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.7% | Exceptional 46.0% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |