Filipino vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,425,791 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.283. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.421% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to a decrease of 421.0 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($59,066 compared to $52,660, a difference of 12.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $116,626, a difference of 10.4%), and median family income ($138,397 compared to $125,956, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $57,818, a difference of 0.14%), wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $46,324, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.53%), male poverty (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and poverty (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.9%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.7% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 0.58%), married-couple households (51.0% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and family households (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.7%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.2%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.18%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.3%).