Guatemalan vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,058,497 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 15.4 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 21.4%), per capita income ($37,766 compared to $44,987, a difference of 19.1%), and median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $55,415, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $51,247, a difference of 0.54%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $39,109, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $61,270, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.5%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.9%), single female poverty (23.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.1%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 98.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.82%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.4%).