Guatemalan vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,329,857 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,766 compared to $49,862, a difference of 32.0%), median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $60,117, a difference of 28.6%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $112,665, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $54,154, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $41,952, a difference of 17.5%), and wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 46.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 45.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 5.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.2%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.1%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.38%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 70.9%), no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 66.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.1%).