Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Uganda No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Immigrants from Uganda
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Immigrants from Uganda
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Uganda No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,779,226 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,911,604 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 0.65%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Immigrants from Uganda |
Minimum | 0.39% | 0.97% |
Maximum | 90.9% | 21.9% |
Range | 90.5% | 20.9% |
Mean | 18.5% | 8.5% |
Median | 9.7% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 10.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.6% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.4% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Uganda by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |