Romanian vs Guatemalan No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Romanian
Guatemalan
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Romanians
Guatemalans
10.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
17.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
16.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Guatemalan No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,027,311 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,589,655 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.41%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Guatemalan |
Minimum | 1.3% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 39.2% | 35.5% |
Range | 37.9% | 33.2% |
Mean | 10.2% | 11.7% |
Median | 8.3% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Guatemalans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Iroquois (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Cambodian (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Sierra Leonean (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Pennsylvania German (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Ukrainians | 28.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 10.7% |
Pueblo | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 26.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 10.8% |
Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |
Crow | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 11.1% |