Polish vs Lithuanian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Polish
Lithuanian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Poles
Lithuanians
8.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Lithuanian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,400,436 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,405,245 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 8.4%, a difference of 0.030%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 0.52% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 35.0% | 16.8% |
Range | 34.5% | 15.5% |
Mean | 7.6% | 7.2% |
Median | 6.4% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Lithuanians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Lebanon (8.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (8.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Spaniard (8.4%, a difference of 0.81%), Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Iran (8.4%, a difference of 0.87%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Lebanon (8.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Cajun (8.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Spaniard (8.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Iran (8.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.89%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Chinese | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Slovaks | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |