Mexican vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Mexican
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Mexicans
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
7.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,467,280 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,763,936 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 41.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Minimum | 3.0% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 11.8% | 20.3% |
Range | 8.7% | 18.7% |
Mean | 6.9% | 8.0% |
Median | 6.6% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Mexicans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are White/Caucasian (7.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Scandinavian (7.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.0%, a difference of 0.67%), European (7.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and Welsh (7.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |