Immigrants from Philippines vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Philippines
Chickasaw
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,724,480 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 8.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.84% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 19.4% | 15.9% |
Range | 18.6% | 14.6% |
Mean | 7.1% | 6.1% |
Median | 6.9% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Portuguese (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bolivian (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |