Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Australian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Australian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Australians
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Australian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,149,436 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,715,583 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Australian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 25.6% | 22.8% |
Range | 24.6% | 22.2% |
Mean | 8.9% | 7.1% |
Median | 8.3% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua and Australians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |