Immigrants from Mexico vs Swiss No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Swiss
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Swiss
8.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Swiss No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,868,339 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,788,069 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 3.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Swiss |
Minimum | 0.44% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 29.4% | 65.0% |
Range | 29.0% | 62.2% |
Mean | 8.1% | 14.0% |
Median | 7.2% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Swiss by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Venezuelan (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from India (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (8.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Laos (8.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and Celtic (8.1%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |