Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Immigrants from Middle Africa
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Immigrants from Middle Africa
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
65.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Middle Africa No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,637,222 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.540 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,497,217 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 3.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.36% |
Maximum | 14.7% | 46.0% |
Range | 12.8% | 45.6% |
Mean | 5.3% | 9.8% |
Median | 4.4% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Middle Africa by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.58%), Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.73%), Australian (10.1%, a difference of 0.79%), Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |