Immigrants from Indonesia vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Indonesia
Sudanese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Indonesia
Sudanese
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
69.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Indonesia vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,406,019 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,072,180 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 2.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Indonesia | Sudanese |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 27.7% | 86.7% |
Range | 25.8% | 86.3% |
Mean | 7.8% | 10.6% |
Median | 7.2% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Indonesia and Sudanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Australian (10.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |