Immigrants from Cambodia vs Hmong No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cambodia
Hmong
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Cambodia
Hmong
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
63.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
52.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Hmong No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,038,606 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.749 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,678,157 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 1.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cambodia | Hmong |
Minimum | 4.3% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 36.9% | 37.4% |
Range | 32.6% | 36.4% |
Mean | 12.0% | 9.2% |
Median | 9.5% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 9.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cambodia and Hmong by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cambodia are Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.11%), New Zealander (10.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.31%), South African (10.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Latin America (10.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Brazilian (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Lumbee (10.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Filipino (10.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Sudan (10.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |
Indonesians | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 10.3% |
Lumbee | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 10.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 10.4% |
Hmong | 52.7 /100 | #171 | Average 10.4% |
Brazilians | 51.7 /100 | #172 | Average 10.4% |
Filipinos | 50.1 /100 | #173 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 49.1 /100 | #175 | Average 10.4% |
French American Indians | 49.1 /100 | #176 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 49.1 /100 | #177 | Average 10.4% |