Immigrants from Bolivia vs Central American No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Central American
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Central Americans
8.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
24.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Central American No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,658,153 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,389,156 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 21.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Central American |
Minimum | 0.50% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 25.6% | 33.8% |
Range | 25.1% | 32.6% |
Mean | 7.5% | 11.8% |
Median | 6.8% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 14.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Potawatomi (8.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Austrian (8.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Central America (8.9%, a difference of 0.66%), Slavic (9.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and Bulgarian (9.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Shoshone (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Pueblo (10.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 36.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 34.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 10.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 33.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 10.7% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 32.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 10.7% |
Ukrainians | 28.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 10.7% |
Pueblo | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 26.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 10.8% |
Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |