Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Iroquois
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Iroquois
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
17.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Iroquois No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,565,234 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.311 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,994,531 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 10.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | Iroquois |
Minimum | 0.94% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 18.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 17.1% | 98.5% |
Mean | 8.5% | 10.1% |
Median | 8.6% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 15.2% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Romanian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Guatemalan (11.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |