Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Belarus No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Immigrants from Belarus
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Immigrants from Belarus
7.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Belarus No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,718,828 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,031,652 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 113.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Belarus |
Minimum | 0.79% | 0.49% |
Maximum | 16.4% | 47.6% |
Range | 15.7% | 47.1% |
Mean | 6.2% | 10.8% |
Median | 5.5% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 10.5% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.10%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Cherokee | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Ghana (16.6%, a difference of 0.86%), Ghanaian (16.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Alaska Native (17.4%, a difference of 3.9%), Soviet Union (17.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and Cypriot (15.7%, a difference of 6.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Israel | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.6% |
Albanians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cypriots | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.7% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.4% |
Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 19.6% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 19.8% |