Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Mexico No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Mexico
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Mexico
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Mexico No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,868,339 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 3.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Mexico |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 29.4% |
Range | 14.6% | 29.0% |
Mean | 6.1% | 8.1% |
Median | 5.5% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Mexico by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Venezuelan (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from India (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (8.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Laos (8.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and Celtic (8.1%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |