White/Caucasian vs Jordanian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Jordanian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Jordanians
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Jordanian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,814,917 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.890 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,280,394 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 3.9%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 0.20% |
| Maximum | 12.8% | 14.3% |
| Range | 9.0% | 14.1% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 5.4% |
| Median | 5.9% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Slavic (4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Cambodian (4.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cuba (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Moldova (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Okinawans | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Australians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slavs | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are American (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Croatia (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (5.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Macedonians | 92.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 92.3 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Estonians | 92.1 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 91.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Lebanese | 91.0 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Americans | 90.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Jordanians | 90.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.3 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 88.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 88.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 87.6 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 87.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.2 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |