Romanian vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Unemployment
COMPARE
Romanian
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Romanians
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
91.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,537,614 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,679,955 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.323 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.99%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 13.0% | 8.4% |
Range | 10.5% | 7.0% |
Mean | 6.2% | 4.5% |
Median | 5.1% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 5.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Estonian (5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), American (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Western Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and South African (5.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |
South Africans | 92.6 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Argentineans | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 91.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 91.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 91.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.1% |