Immigrants from Sudan vs Chilean Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Chilean
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Chileans
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chilean Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,944,450 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,557,466 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Chilean |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 13.3% | 29.3% |
| Range | 12.0% | 27.9% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 6.0% |
| Median | 4.5% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan and Chileans by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from South Africa (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ukrainian (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Austria (5.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Serbia (5.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from England (5.0%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Lithuania (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Romania (5.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 96.3 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Ukrainians | 96.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 95.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |