Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Moldova
Immigrants from Jordan
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Moldova
Immigrants from Jordan
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,255,765 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,116,498 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 5.1%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Moldova | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.20% |
Maximum | 11.8% | 11.7% |
Range | 10.3% | 11.5% |
Mean | 5.0% | 5.2% |
Median | 4.7% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Moldova by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Serbian (4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), White/Caucasian (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Slavic (4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Cambodian (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Thais | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Australians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Cambodians | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Slavs | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Palestinian (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |